Free LNAT guide, no signup, sources named and linked
Essay Section B, decoded
The official ideal is about - words. Universities receive the essay directly, and each decides how to use it. Clear reasoning matters more than legal knowledge or decorative vocabulary.
Know the job before choosing the topic
Section B gives you minutes to answer one of three prompts. The essay should demonstrate economical argument and reach a conclusion. The board's own guidance puts the ideal at - words and warns that very long essays disadvantage candidates; it publishes no maximum.
You may state assumptions instead of carrying a warehouse of facts. Name the assumption and show the reasoning it supports.
Give the clock four jobs
| Time | Job | Visible result |
|---|---|---|
| - min | Choose and define | A bounded claim and provisional judgement |
| - min | Build the spine | Two reasons, strongest objection and reply |
| - min | Write | Paragraphs that each move the argument |
| - min | Judge and edit | A qualified conclusion with repetition removed |
The split is a practice rule rather than an official rubric. Adjust it only after timed evidence shows where your argument currently collapses.
Build a plan that can change your mind
Worked example Should public debate protect offensive speech?
Define the claim
Protection means a strong presumption against punishment by public authorities. Offensive covers expression that wounds or alarms without directly threatening unlawful harm.
Reason one
Authorities can stretch vague offence rules against unpopular minorities, so broad power creates a risk of selective enforcement.
Strongest objection
Repeated degrading speech can exclude people from public life even without a direct threat, so unrestricted protection can hollow out equal participation.
Reply and judgement
Protect offence alone, while allowing narrow rules for threats, targeted harassment and conduct that blocks equal access. The judgement is strong but conditional.
Why this works: The final position becomes more precise after meeting the strongest objection.
Why the tempting route fails: Listing one argument on each side and ending with 'both have a point' leaves the disputed boundary undecided.
Make every paragraph prove something
- Claim: what should the reader accept by the end of this paragraph?
- Reason: why does the claim follow?
- Example or assumption: what concrete case makes the reason testable?
- Link: how does this change the overall judgement?
- Cut background that never enters the reasoning.
- Replace three undeveloped examples with one example whose relevance you explain.
- Remove repeated topic sentences and intensifiers.
- Check that the conclusion states the condition controlling your extent of agreement.
Sources
LNAT hints and tips. The - word ideal, assumptions, position defence, economy and editing advice. Read the official advicehttps://lnat.ac.uk/how-to-prepare/hints-and-tips/
LNAT sample essays. Official examples for comparing structure and expression. Read the sample essayshttps://lnat.ac.uk/how-to-prepare/sample-essays/
LNAT test format. One of three prompts in minutes. Check the formathttps://lnat.ac.uk/what-is-lnat/test-format/
The worked prompt and plan are original. Universities may apply their own essay rubric.